the mere obstinacy of the self

“ ‘ “A man should be fixed,” the chairman said. “The board felt that a certain firmness was lacking—”

‘ “That one ought to know his necessity and bow down to it?”

‘ “Yes,” the chairman said, “that’s it.”

‘ “One is what one is?”

‘ “Properly so,” the chairman said, “yes.”

‘ “No,” the young man said. “What you call character is the mere obstinacy of the self, the sinister will’s solipsist I am. One adjusts his humanity to the humanity of others. Not I am, but You are— there’s the necessity. Love cooperates; it plays ball. I hate a chaos. Does the company need me?” ’ ”

(Stanley Elkin, A Bad Man, p. 171–2.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)